Impact of information about the altruistic behavior of men and women on their workplace assessment

Authors

  • Anna Hełka Szkoła Wyższa Psychologii Społecznej Wydział Zamiejscowy we Wrocławiu
  • Renata Pielaszek absolwentka i magister psychologii w Szkole Wyższej Psychologii Społecznej Wydział Zamiejscowy we Wrocławiu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14659/PJOEP.2012.02.04

Keywords:

altruism at work, gender stereotypes, cultural differences, employee evaluation, financial and non-financial motivators

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to replicate a study examining the differences in the consequences of the occurrence or absence of altruistic behavior in the workplace, as related to the assessment and recommendation of awards for male and female workers. In addition, possible cross-cultural differences between Poland and the United States are assessed in this regard. In our study, like in the original American study, there was a significant interaction effect between gender and information about the occurrence or absence of altruistic behavior in the workplace, with respect to developmental assessment and recommendation of awards. There was also a strong interaction effect for perceived negative features. In Poland, the altruistic behavior of women, unlike men in the U.S., has a positive effect on the developmental assessment, but does not increase women’s opportunities for promotion. However, if a woman does not provide assistance, she will be punished with a lower assessment and decreased chances of any bonuses. Such sanctions are not applied to men. A lack of altruistic behavior influences the negative perception of women, but not men. The information about altruistic behavior at work improves the image of the male, but not the female worker. In addition, the Polish study reported a stronger effect than in the U.S. of the occurrence or lack of altruistic behavior on the perception of the employee. Helpers are assessed positively in both countries.

References

Bilińska, A., Rawłuszko, M. (2011), Menedżerka sukcesu 2011 – szanse i ograniczenia kariery zawodowej kobiet w Polsce. Bariery doświadczane przez kobiety w karierze zawodowej, [online, dostęp: 01.03.2012]:http://www.mfk.org.pl/uploads/kobieta_i_biznes/kib_4-10_2011.

Boguszewski, R.(red.) (2010), Co jest ważne, co można, a czego nie wolno – normy i wartości w życiu Polaków, Komunikat z badań CBOS BS/99/2010, [online, dostęp: 01.03.2012]: <http://www.cbos.pl/PL/publikacje/ raporty_2010.php>.

Budrowska, B., Duch, D., Titkow, A. (2003), Szklany sufit: bariery i ograniczenia karier polskich kobiet. Raport z badań jakościowych, Warszawa, Instytut Spraw Publicznych.

Butler, D., Geis, F. L. (1990), Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: Implications for leadership evaluations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1).

Carli, L. L., LaFleur, S. J., Loeber, C. C. (1995), Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68.

Cialdini, R. B., Trost, M. R. (1998), Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance, (w:) D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, G. Lindzey (red.), The handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2, Boston, McGraw-Hill.

Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J. (2002), Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders, Psychological Review 109(3).

Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., Klonsky, B. G. (1992), Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin 111(1).

Hausmann, R., Tyson, L. D., Zahidi, S. (2011), The Global Gender Gap Report 2011. World Economic Forum, [online, dostęp: 28.05.2012]: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Library/Documents/global-gender-gap-reporteducation-2011- en.pdf

Heilman, M. E., Chen, J. J. (2005), Same Behavior, Different Consequences: Reactions to Men’s and Women’s Altruistic Citizenship Behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology 90(3).

Heilman, M. E. (2001), Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder, Journal of Social Issues 57.

Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., Martell, R. F. (1995), Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers?, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10.

Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., Martell, R. F., Simon, M. C. (1989), Has anything changed? Current characterizations of men, women, and managers, Journal of Applied Psychology 74(6).

Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., Tamkins, M. M. (2004), Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male tasks, Journal of Applied Psychology 89(3).

Lewandowski, E. (2007), Co wiemy o charakterze Polaków, Polityka, 19.04.2007, [online, dostęp: 01.03.2012]: http://www.polityka.pl/spoleczenstwo/niezbednikinteligenta/216105,1,co-wiemy-ocharakterzepolakow.read#ixzz1pYMSfqOf

Motowidlo, S. J., Van Scotter, J. R. (1994), Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance, Journal of Applied Psychology 79(4).

Organ, D. W., Konovsky, M. A. (1989), Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology 74.

Rudman, L. A. (1998), Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counter-stereotypical impression management, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(3).

Sedlak, K. (red.) (2011), XIX ogólnobranżowy raport płacowy 2010 rok, Kraków, Sedlak & Sedlak.

Downloads

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES